考虑标度的加型一致性模糊判断矩阵的排序方法

通过实例说明相关文献中加型一致性模糊判断矩阵排序方法的参数取值存在的问题,分析出该问题是由于其公式证明中没有区分标度导致的,指出其结论适用于0～1标度的加型一致性模糊判断矩阵.然后,重新证明了0.1～0.9标度下的加型一致性模糊判决矩阵的排序方法和相关结论.最后,定义了广义模糊标度,并给出广义模糊标度下加型一致性模糊判断矩阵的排序方法和相关结论,使得相关文献中排序方法和相关结论实现形式上的统一.     

Ideals and monisms: recent criticisms of the Strong Programme in the sociology of knowledge

I offer a reply to criticisms of the Strong Programme presented by Stephen Kemp who develops some new lines of argument that focus on the ‘monism’ of the programme. He says the programme should be rejected for three reasons. First, because it embodies ‘weak idealism’, that is, its supporters effectively sever the link between language and the world. Second, it challenges the reasons that scientists offer in explanation of their own beliefs. Third, it destroys the distinction between successful and unsuccessful instrumental action. Kemp is careful to produce quotations from the supporters of the programme as evidence to support his case. All three points deserve and are given a detailed response and the interpretation of the quoted material plays a significant role in the discussion. My hope is that careful exegesis will offset the numerous misinterpretations that are current in the philosophical literature. Particular attention is paid to what is said about the normative standards involved in the application of empirical concepts. The operation of these standards in the face of the negotiability of all concepts is explored and misapprehensions on the topic are corrected. The work of Wittgenstein, Popper, Kuhn and Hesse is used to illustrate these themes.     

用PowerBuilder实现仓库管理系统的开发

以 2 35处仓库管理系统为例 ,介绍了利用 Power Builder开发数据库的设计与实现方案 ,并对其设计过程出现的问题进行了分析和解决     

Saving the Strong Programme? A critique of David Bloor’s recent work

This article critically appraises David Bloor’s recent attempts to refute criticisms levelled at the Strong Programme’s social constructionist approach to scientific knowledge. Bloor has tried to argue, contrary to some critics, that the Strong Programme is not idealist in character, and it does not involve a challenge to the credibility of scientific knowledge. I argue that Bloor’s attempt to deflect the charge of idealism, which calls on the self-referential theory of social institutions, is partially successful. However, I suggest that although the Strong Programme should not be accused of ‘strong idealism’, it is still vulnerable to the criticism that it entails a form of ‘weak idealism’. The article moves on to argue that, contrary to Bloor, constructionist approaches do challenge the credibility of the scientific knowledge that they analyse. I conclude the article by arguing that sociological analyses of scientific knowledge can be conducted without the weak idealism and the credibility-challenging assumptions of the Strong Programme approach.     

广义判断下AHP(GJAHP)的一致性检验与可接受性的进一步探讨

广义判断下的AHP(GJAHP)是在单准则下通过构造广义判断矩阵的数学模型而建立的一种广义AHP.本文提出了广义判断矩阵一致性的一种非参数统计检验方法--spearman秩相关系数法, 给出了广义辅助矩阵的构造性定义, 并进一步探讨了广义判断矩阵的可接受性。最后本文给出了GJAHP的应用实例。     

语言判断矩阵的一致性及相关问题研究

研究了语言判断矩阵的一致性及基于语言判断矩阵的方案排序问题.在给出语言判断矩阵有关概念的基础上,通过对有序语言短语集中的有序语言短语进行"量化",给出了语言间相互作用的运算定义,探讨了语言短语及语言判断矩阵的基本性质,进一步从理论上提出了语言判断矩阵完全一致性和满意一致性的概念;为了方便检验语言判断矩阵的一致性,通过引入导出矩阵的概念将语言判断矩阵转化为数量矩阵,并提出了语言判断矩阵完全一致性、满意一致性的简便的判定方法;针对基于语言判断矩阵的方案排序问题,根据导出矩阵的性质通过求解最大特征根,给出了一种简便的方案排序方法;最后通过两个算例说明了本文给出的一致性判定方法和方案排序方法.     

基于强跟踪滤波器估计的最优融合方法

在分布式雷达数据处理模式中 ,数据融合是获得较精确的目标轨迹的主要环节。为克服卡尔曼滤波器对初始值敏感、鲁棒性差和对机动目标跟踪性能差的缺陷 ,通过利用各传感器的观测数据 ,采用强跟踪滤波器对目标进行跟踪 ,以改善目标状态估计的精度。对判定源于同一目标的状态估计值 ,给出了一种估计状态线进行性组合的最优融合准则。得出了实际数据的实验结果。     

NA样本回归函数递归型估计的强相合性

本文在NA相依样本下给出了非参数回归函数加权递归核估计gn(x)=n∑(i=1)yi(xi-xi-1)/hi K(x-xi/hi)的渐近无偏性和相合性的充分条件。其中这里得到的充分条件与一般加权回归函数核估计的相合性几乎完全一致。     

知识的粒度计算及其应用

粗糙集理论是一种较新的软计算方法 ,可以有效地分析和处理不完备信息 .本文介绍了知识的粒度、属性的重要度及协调度等概念及计算方法 ,并给出属性的重要度在求属性集的最小约简、协调度在构造决策树方面的具体步骤 .最后 ,通过几个例子说明了这些概念和方法的有效性.     

论运动量的安排

针对目前,大多数运动训练中,运动量安排上的不合理的状况,笔者在体操领域中进行了探索。通过对苏联、日本队夺得世界冠军前的训练的有关数据的统计,并结合自己的经验,进行了研究分析,在理论上提出了“训练的适应征象”。并得出了大运动量与成绩密切相关的结论。并且对训练的负荷密度、强度问题做了进一步阐述。